![]() In addition to using HTTP for simplicity, REST offers a number of other benefits over SOAP: ![]() Plus, it entered the scene as a way to access web services in a much simpler way than possible with SOAP by using HTTP. But REST has been around for a good time now as well. This gives it the advantage of being an established, legacy protocol. SOAP was originally created by Microsoft, and it’s been around a lot longer than REST. Still, in most cases, either REST or SOAP could be used to achieve the same outcome (and both are infinitely scalable), with some differences in how you’d configure it. To put it simply, REST accesses data while SOAP performs operations through a more standardized set of messaging patterns. Additionally, it operates through different interfaces. SOAP, on the other hand, exposes components of application logic as services rather than data. It’s most commonly used when you’re exposing a public API over the Internet. REST operates through a solitary, consistent interface to access named resources. REST and how each can benefit your organization’s goals. Understand the primary differences between SOAP vs. SOAP was long the standard approach to web service interfaces, although it’s been dominated by REST in recent years, with REST now representing more than 70% of public APIs according to Stormpath. I am just guessin.It does not depend on what kind of data you send.SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) and REST (Representational State Transfer) are both web service communication protocols. ![]() What's the difference between sending in binary format and textual/xml content in terms of marshalling-demarshalling or serialization-deserialization? In distributed programming,I am not talking about the process which happens in the same JVM,it's about how you copy data.It is either pass by value or pass by reference.Binary format corresponds to pass by value which means copying an object to remote server in binaries.If you have any doubt until now I d like to hear If you have some kind of textual/XML content anyway, web services may be equivalent or even faster, since then you would not need to convert anything at all (for communication)."Īs far as I know the performance issue makes difference during serialization-deserialization in other words marshalling-demarshalling process.I am not sure both these terms are same btw If you want to send complex object nets from one application to another, it's probably faster with RMI, since it's transfered in a binary format (usually). "The performance depends on the data that you are planning to exchange. If you have some kind of textual/XML content anyway, web services may be equivalent or even faster, since then you would not need to convert anything at all (for Klinke The performance depends on the data that you are planning to exchange. If you have an EJB container, you can call session beans via RMI and additionally expose them as web services, if you really need to, by the way. SOA does not depend on technology so much as on good service design. If you know that this issue is not a problem, you should consider using RMI. ![]() RMI requires you to open another port for your application which may be difficult (not technically, though) in some environments. If you have to pass through a proxy or some corporate firewall(s), Web Services are more likely to work since they are relying on HTTP only. Whether you use Web Services or a more "native" approach depends on the environment as well. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |